Accountability in the time of coronavirus

The reasons we’re fighting haven’t changed. They’ve grown all the more pressing.

Dear EXXONKNEWS readers,

It’s been a week since I wrote to you last, and what a year it has been (or was it a decade?). You don’t need us to tell you that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed a lot about our lives in a very short period of time. 

Credit: Giphy

In all seriousness, our thoughts are with everyone during this unprecedented time. Please stay safe, follow the CDC’s recommendations, and make sure to check in with friends, loved ones, and neighbors. 

In a period of so many uncertainties, at least one thing is clear: whether it’s our relationship with the climate, our environment, or with each other, there is no decision we can make, individually or societally, that doesn’t ripple outwards and back. We are inextricably connected, and community matters — especially now.

But I want to talk about a different connection, too, one whose destructive consequences coronavirus has put on full display. That’s the connection between people in leadership roles (elected officials, government agencies, the presidency) and powerful actors with money to make and strings to pull. 

The fact is, big businesses, industries, and profit-driven institutions have controlled government decision-making (and lack thereof) in America for so long that it is hard to remember that another way is even possible. Be honest, when the Trump administration floated a bailout for the fossil fuel industry in response to coronavirus, how many of us said “of course!” and considered that normal? 

Chris D'Angelo 🌎 @c_m_dangelo

Trump's got Big Oil's back. The administration is forging ahead with oil and gas lease sales and plans to purchase 77 million barrels of crude to give U.S. producers a lift. w/ @AlexCKaufman

huffpost.comNot Even A Pandemic Can Stop Trump From Pushing Fossil FuelsAnything for Big Oil.

When our leaders prioritize powerful interests over public safety, everyone suffers (some more than most). In Science magazine last week, H. Holden Thorp railed against the hypocrisy of our current administration demanding a coronavirus vaccine after years of draining funding for scientific research and promoting denialist statements on climate change: “you can't insult science when you don't like it and then suddenly insist on something that science can't give on demand,” he writes. President Trump denied the severity of coronavirus until the very last minute, confusing the public and endangering lives for the sake of his own political goals. We are seeing in real time that science denial kills. 

Jimmy Kimmel @jimmykimmel

At the end of all this, let’s try to remember that the geniuses who told us not to worry about coronavirus are the same geniuses telling us not to worry about #climatechange

As recently as last week, people were left scrambling for provisions and medical advice in the absence of accurate information, action and preparedness from the federal government. The same has long been true for the climate crisis: individuals are expected to come up with solutions to a problem that simply can’t be addressed on an individual scale. While we might want to shame other people for going to bars and brunch (really though, stay home if you can) or in the case of the climate crisis, driving SUVs and eating meat, in most cases only widespread and coordinated action is effective. Simply asking people to avoid bars and restaurants, for instance, was not. 

When it comes to climate change, the damage has been staggered over longer periods of time; negligence is therefore less visible, and easier to commit. But the outcome of denying science is essentially the same. The bigger difference is that in the case of climate change, we have an industry behind the curtain (fossil fuels, that is) that has been pouring money into denial and working to delay action at all costs. As Somini Sengupta of the New York Times put it last week, “change is hard when there’s a powerful industry blocking it.” That is for sure.

John Schwartz @jswatz

One reason people are acting on coronavirus with more alacrity than they do on climate change: There's no pro-virus industry trying to block action. @SominiSengupta

nytimes.comClimate Change Has Lessons for Fighting the CoronavirusThe slow global response to climate change shows the cost of inaction in global crises.

If nothing else, the swift nature of the coronavirus pandemic will highlight some essential truths that, if acknowledged, could allow us to confront climate change in a way that is effective, just, and fair. 

We need our leaders to let science, not industry and special interests, tell us what the appropriate or “realistic” response to disaster actually is. We need to act quickly and decisively, and refuse to let those interested in prolonging or politicizing disaster determine our pace. We need plans and provisions in place for those who will be hit hardest financially and otherwise, to make sure they won’t bear the burden of prior inaction on their own. We need those in power to equip society with the real solutions and yes, factual information needed to act when disasters do occur. We need them to serve workers and the public, not industries and their lobbyists. We need better than a free for all, better than every person for themselves, and much, much better than denial and delay.

Zoë Schlanger @zoeschlanger

It’s wild how ‘climate change’ could so easily be subbed in for the virus in so many of these pleas

Sarah Posner @sarahposner

As their death toll continues to rise, doctors and locals in Italy have been warning the United States -- and the rest of the world -- about the dangers of #COVID19. Will we listen? https://t.co/UMWqaHlH33 via @HuffPost https://t.co/n2niJdQvNm

We need accountability now more than ever. So yes, a lot has changed — but the reasons we’re fighting this fight are stronger than ever. 

Stay safe out there. 

In solidarity, 

EXXONKNEWS

---

If you haven’t yet subscribed to EXXONKNEWS, you can do so below.

ICYMI News Roundup

• The Trump administration is planning to buoy the oil industry and continue promoting fossil fuels in the midst of the coronavirus crisis.

• A group of youth plaintiffs in Montana are suing the state over its climate-wrecking energy policy.

• Exxon is hoping to write its own regulatory framework for methane emissions, which it claims will be both “cost-effective and reasonable.” Danger, Will Robinson.

• A federal judge has ruled that MA Attorney General Maura Healey’s investor fraud suit against Exxon belongs in state court.

• A new report found that global banks have sent $2.7 trillion to fossil fuel companies in the four years since the Paris Agreement was signed.

• Cities are pushing the idea that gasoline should come with a climate change warning label. Will this impact consumer use, producer advertising, or both?